Search for: "Thomas v. Department of Corrections"
Results 1 - 20
of 733
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2024, 6:46 am
And finally, the justices were asked in Department of Agriculture v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Tallent of counsel), for appellants.The West Firm, PLLC, Albany (Thomas S. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Tallent of counsel), for appellants.The West Firm, PLLC, Albany (Thomas S. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Meehan of the bar of the District of Columbia, admitted pro hac vice and Thomas S. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Meehan of the bar of the District of Columbia, admitted pro hac vice and Thomas S. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am
Reserved Judgments Harrison v Cameron, heard 26 March 2024 (Steyn J) BW Legal Services Limited v Trustpilot, heard 7 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Unity Plus Healthcare Limited v Clay and others, heard 1 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Vince v Associated Newspapers, heard 19 February 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard… [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm
In the front row, Judge Thomas Hardiman of the U.S. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
It proposes to dismantle or radically overhaul the Departments of Justice and State; eliminate the Departments of Homeland Security, Education, and Commerce; radically repurpose other agencies; and eviscerate the professional civil service. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm
Merrill v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm
He noted that just last week, in Bissonnette v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 7:17 am
This is precisely correct. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 6:36 am
Department of Commerce, both of which asked the Court to overrule Chevron. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm
Alito dissented, joined by Thomas. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:16 am
In a statement regarding the denial of review, Alito agreed that, for procedural reasons, the court was correct to turn down the department’s petition. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
Lash's treatment of the legislative history of Section Three departs from these premises at a number of points. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:48 pm
How do the NetChoice cases relate to Murthy v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]