Search for: "Thomas v. Stephens, et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 160
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
As Thomas Piketty has shown, returns to capital and to labor have been heavily skewed toward capital in recent decades due largely to legal and economic frameworks.[23] With respect to politics, one often hears that business should remain “neutral. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Silja Voeneky, et. al., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Responsible Artificial Intelligence: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (2022). 82. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Bruen, 597 U.S. 1, 36–37 (2022) (Thomas, J., for the majority of the Court); Bostock v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 7:26 am
Sources: Complaint at 32, Borné et. al. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:55 pm
These practices are detailed in the briefs of the Alameda County Public Defenders et al. and The Bronx Defenders Union and National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 5:12 pm
Flora et al. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 1:18 pm
Saltzburg et al., 3 Federal Rules of Evidence Manual § 701.02[7] (Matthew Bender 12th ed.) [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Castile & and Stephen J. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
*This post is part of a symposium on Modernizing Regulatory Review. [read post]
30 May 2023, 1:10 pm
[6] Crawford et al. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Hoeflich and Stephen Sheppard, Lucy and the Judge: Wood v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The critics and cheerleaders of Dr. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Cockrum v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am
See, e.g., Stephen P. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 3:20 pm
Ansley of Duane Morris LLP, representing Real Parties (State Water Contractors, Inc. et al) in the case. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Consider Dobbs v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
U.S. defendants can request access to the evidence, but there is, as Judge Stephen Smith has detailed, increasing deference in federal courts to so-called "law enforcement privilege"—the withholding of information about evidence-gathering techniques during a trial—can extend to software and prevent its examination for errors. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
U.S. defendants can request access to the evidence, but there is, as Judge Stephen Smith has detailed, increasing deference in federal courts to so-called "law enforcement privilege"—the withholding of information about evidence-gathering techniques during a trial—can extend to software and prevent its examination for errors. [read post]
