Search for: "Tomlinson v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2018, 7:52 am by INFORRM
  This is a question that, as the Supreme Court confirmed in 2010 (in R v Chaytor), and as the High Court reminded us as recently as 15 June 2018, is an appropriate question for the court to determine. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
A Superior Court judge is to rule on whether to place a gag order against a mortgage broker accused of using electronic billboards across New Hampshire to sully the reputation of three prominent Manchester businessmen. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The trial in the case of Graeme Cowper v Fairfax Media Publications is continuing before a McCallum J and a NSW Supreme Court jury. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 5:57 am by Sally-Ann Underhill and James Hatchard
In Yemgas FZCO & Ors v Superior Pescadores SA [2016] EWCA Civ 101, the Court of Appeal considered whether the standard ‘Paramount Clause’ wording in the Congenbill incorporates the Hague Rules 1924 (the “HR”) or the Hague/Visby Rules (the “HVR”). [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Oracle Corp. (2011) 51 Cal.4th 1191, 1206 [under UCL, California employer’s failure to pay overtime wages to out-of-state employees was an unlawful business practice]; Tomlinson v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Messier, 2014 QCCS 357 (judgment in French) the Quebec Superior Court awarded Can$5,000 moral damages and Can$5,000 punitive damages in respect of defamatory allegations published on the internet. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Makudi v Triesman, 28 November 2013 (Laws, Tomlinson and Rafferty LJJ). [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:55 pm by Gordon Firemark
Blancarte is preparing his appeal to the Superior Court and we will hear more on the plight of the California entertainment lawyer as unlicensed talent agent. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Superior Court (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1006:Under the Elections Code, a city council facing a qualifying citizen sponsored land use initiative measure is precluded from direct adoption of the measure without first complying with CEQA. [read post]