Search for: "Torres v Reade" Results 1 - 20 of 287
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2024, 12:33 pm by Josh Blackman
Justice Kavanaugh also responded to Justice Thomas's concurrence to explain why Almendarez-Torres v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The doctrine of res judicata applies to preclude plaintiff’s claims asserted in the third action, as those claims arise out of the same transaction or series of transactions that were brought to a final conclusion in the first action by plaintiff against, among others, defendant Allan Houston (Rondeau v Houston, 2013 NY Slip Op 33363[U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2013], affd 118 AD3d 638 [1st Dept 2014], lv dismissed 24 NY3d 999 [2015]; see In re Hunter, 4 NY3d 260,… [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 8:10 am by Unreported Opinions
Read the opinion The post JESUS TORRES, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JACY BRICE TORRES PONCE v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:15 pm by Michael Lowe
  Read, “Sex trafficking sting operation in Arizona during Super Bowl leads to multiple arrests,” written by Miguel Torres and published by AZ Central on February 26, 2023. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 3:07 am by Ellena Erskine
(Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, State Court Report) U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
At times, the “benevolent appellate gods smiled down on me” (36), she writes, with Almendarez-Torres v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 10:24 am by Dennis Crouch
”  On this point, the court distinguished the case of Torres v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 2:00 pm by Kate Fort
Connecticut Law Review Symposium: Interrogating Haaland v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:21 am by Peter J. Sluka
Sigalit v Kahlon Last week, in Sigalit v Kahlon, 21-cv-08921 (SDNY Aug. 30, 2023) United States District Judge Analisa Torres granted the Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on an accounting claim. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 12:16 pm
Regardless, Judge Sanchez's majority opinion says that it's not clear that the judge relied that much on the (alleged) broken promise, whereas Judge Mendoza (in dissent) thinks that the judge probably did.You can read the record for yourself and see which view you fight most appealing in this regard.But I can add one thing -- something that's maybe (okay, certainly) not subject to judicial notice, but is nonetheless something as to which I'm fairly/supremely… [read post]