Search for: "Townsend v. State of North Carolina"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm
Last December, the North Carolina Supreme Court added to that list with its opinion in State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 3:53 pm
Townsend, State v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
The majority in Dobbs v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 11:44 am
State v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 10:38 am
State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 5:00 am
State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 10:00 am
The post The DWI Year in Review, Part II appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 4:37 am
” The forum selection bylaw at issue in City of Providence was “virtually identical” to the bylaw adopted in Boilermakers with the exception that, unlike the bylaws in Boilermakers, which designated Delaware as the exclusive forum, the bylaw designated “as the forum the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, or, if that court lacks jurisdiction, any North Carolina state court with… [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:01 am
Overocker and State v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 12:42 pm
Townsend Beefs Up Prejudice Required for Relief under Knoll appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 5:10 pm
Dietz of the Winston-Salem, North Carolina, law firm of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:48 am
North America Corp., No. 07-4060 (3rd Cir. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 3:06 pm
Leake, et al., 08-120) involved a challenge to a North Carolina law enacted in 2002 that provided for public financing for candidates running for seats on the state supreme court and the state court of appeals. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 4:36 pm
Issue: Whether provisions of North Carolina election law that permit publicly funded judicial candidates to receive extra money if targeted by independent advocacy groups, and that impose additional reporting requirements on privately funded candidates, violate the First Amendment. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 11:06 am
Thus we agree with cases like Townsend v. [read post]