Search for: "Trademark Holder Identified in Exhibit 1"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2024, 7:24 pm
Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) Patent Term Extension (“PTE”) decisions under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am
’s trademark. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:59 pm
Filing bases for director-initiated: 15 44(e), 14 1(a), 4 66(a). [read post]
How Has Blockchain Technology Fared in China? –from a case study of LRB to the most recent NFT cases
27 Mar 2023, 9:50 am
The company launched an in-app feature called “R-Space” in November 2021,[1] providing LRB users with a one-stop shop to buy and showcase blockchain-based digital collectibles.[2] Activating R-space is no fuss. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:11 am
The scope of these rights under the Copyright Act of 1976 extends to works that exhibit a modicum of originality and are fixed in a tangible medium. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 12:46 pm
Plaintiffs allegedly used the 12 O’Clock Boyz trademarks since 2001 and registered the marks in 2016. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 7:52 am
That, in a few words, was 2021. 1. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 9:00 pm
Trademark law differs from copyright law because trademark protection applies to the use of a mark in the course of business to identify the source or sponsorship of goods and/or services, while copyright protection applies to works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression (as noted above), regardless of whether the uses of such works identify the source of goods/services. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 3:54 pm
Patent Holder Identified in Exhibit 1 vs. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
From Patent Holder Identified in Exh. 1 v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
The EEOC identified three way [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 9:32 am
June 1, 2011); Upshaw v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 9:32 am
June 1, 2011); Upshaw v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
In March, new research showed that music and football right holders had brought the most cases to London's High Court in the preceding year. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
Then Defendants argue that their name, “Moschino,” falls into the exception of Section 1202(c), as “personally identifying information about the user of a work”. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 7:34 am
Under New Kids, we ask whether (1) the product was “readily identifiable” without use of the mark; (2) defendant used more of the mark than necessary; or (3) defendant falsely suggested he was sponsored or endorsed by the trademark holder. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 6:03 am
Cairns held that Princess Diana’s image was only weakly associated with the plaintiffs claiming to control her publicity rights, “largely because Princess Diana’s image had not served a source-identifying (trademark) function during her life or after her death. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:11 am
The court identified three character traits of Holmes and Watson as still protected: (1) Dr. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:29 am
It didn't take its trademark assertions to trial. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:13 am
The nation that created the exception to trademark rights has the burden under TRIPS Article 17 to prove that (1) the exception is limited, and (2) the exception takes into account the legitimate interests of both the trademark holder and third parties. [read post]
