Search for: "Traveler's Ins. Co. v. Jones" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[32] The parties’ intentions are considered a matter of law, and intent is referred to the trier of fact only if a court determines that the document is ambiguous as a matter of law.[33] Under the objective standard, statements of the parties’ intentions carry the greatest weight.[34] In Teachers Ins. and Annuity Ass’n of America v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:33 pm
Co. v Lee, 120 AD3d 497, 498-499 [2d Dept 2014]; Jones v Peerless Ins. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 11:15 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Travelers Indemnity Co. of America, 2012 WL 677007 (E.D. [read post]