Search for: "Tri-Central v. Mason" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
 That is the central reason why James Madison, seconded by James Wilson, first moved on June 1 that the Executive be vested with the power “to appoint to offices in cases not otherwise provided for. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
If he was not, his offense was still liable to be tried and punished in the ordinary tribunals of justice. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:58 pm by Peter Margulies
U.S. asylum officers are in the main dedicated and capable, but judicial review of asylum decisions at the U.S. border is exceedingly limited—limits that the Supreme Court upheld on June 25 in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am by Jay Pinho
” Several weeks later, on July 18, Justice Elena Kagan appeared at Georgetown as well, where she recounted her memorable Kimble v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 7:56 am by Russell Spivak, Benjamin Wittes
” More recently, the Terrorism, Transnational Crime and Corruption Center (TTCCC) hosted a conference on the topic at George Mason University, at which one of us spoke. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 2:15 am by NCC Staff
After the convention, the absence of a Bill of Rights emerged as a central part of the ratification debates. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am by Jane Chong
  The Impeachable Offense The central inquiry: “What offenses are impeachable? [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am by SHG
But at George Mason (now the Antonin Scalia Law School) the admissions advisor, Prof. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:22 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  A central planner has a difficult time getting the right combination of institutional rules. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am by Bruce Ackerman
 If we are to present the best case for its roots in popular sovereignty, Transformations urges us to broaden our analytic frame beyond, and recognize the central role of the separation-of-powers in gaining the American people’s deliberate consent to the Republican’s constitutional revolution. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am by John Mikhail
  Finally, I'll also explain why the article's new account of the original understanding of the Necessary and Proper Clause can serve as a useful framework for addressing some of the issues presented in Bond v. [read post]