Search for: "True v. True" Results 1 - 20 of 33,584
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
If public-school students have a First Amendment right to wear black armbands at school in protest of the Vietnam War (in Tinker v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 11:31 am by Ronald Mann
” The issue in Office of the United States Trustee v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 9:54 am by John Floyd
  In a May 22, 2024 report, Forbes Magazine called attention to some of Alito’s past behaviors and court decisions that underscore his long held ultra-right wing political ideology: his college-days involvement with a Princeton University alumni group that didn’t allow women or minorities as members; his vocal “not true” opposition to former President Barak Obama criticism of the Court’s handling of a campaign finance ruling during a State of the Union… [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 9:00 am
Today's advance release criminal law opinions: State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
” The explanation for failure to consider due process in past cases was “faulty” because it did not consider the due process clause, which protects vested rights.Weimer considered a 2008 case, Burmaster v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:15 am by Josh Blackman
As the Government points out, that strong protection for conscience remains true even in a so-called healthcare desert, where other doctors are not readily available. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"On a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the complaint must be afforded a liberal construction, the facts therein must be accepted as true, and the plaintiff must be accorded the benefit of every possible favorable inference" (Angeli v Barket, 211 AD3d 896, 897; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87). [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"On a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the complaint must be afforded a liberal construction, the facts therein must be accepted as true, and the plaintiff must be accorded the benefit of every possible favorable inference" (Angeli v Barket, 211 AD3d 896, 897; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87). [read post]