Search for: "Tucker v. Government Employees Insurance"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Of course, there are various defenses that employers, insurance carriers, and their servicing agents may raise to contest an employee’s right to recover benefits, such as untimely notice of an injury, misrepresentation, and even fraud. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 9:36 am
Services, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 7:00 am
See Tucker v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 7:00 am
See Tucker v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 7:00 am
See Tucker v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:40 am
The case, Tucker v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am
The respondents, former independent claim adjusters, brought a qui tam suit under the FCA alleging that, in the wake of the hurricane (we slay ourselves with our meteorological puns), State Farm misadjusted federal flood claims by attributing wind damage (which State Farm would cover) to flood damage (which would be covered by flood policies issued under the federal government’s National Flood Insurance Program). [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 6:24 am
The case is Robinson v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Employee Leadership Fund v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 1:16 pm
Although the government acquiesced in jurisdiction in the district court, the Tucker Act applies, jurisdiction over this case was proper only in the Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
Sebelius, 22 No. 34 Westlaw Journal Insurance Coverage 3, Westlaw Journal Insurance Coverage June 1, 2012 May 21 (Reuters) - The University of Notre Dame and dozens of other Catholic institutions have sued the Obama administration to block a government regulation that requires employers to provide health insurance coverage for contraceptives to employees. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:19 pm
The only interesting part of the opinion was that the court recognized that the MSP makes no mention, much less any promise, of reimbursement by Medicare for expenses a private insurer alleges are the primary obligation of the federal government. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 9:15 am
Levinson and the standard for scienter under Tellabs v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia September 23, 2011 Gonzalez-Droz v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:38 am
In the Court’s most recent foray, in United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 6:58 am
Something called a premium waiver due to disability.Some group life insurance plans - including many covered by the federal ERISA law that governs employee benefits - have a provision that allows disabled employees to keep their life insurance coverage. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:21 am
Tucker and Tucker & Ludin, P.A. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:56 am
Co. v Tucker, 273 AD2d 683 [2000]). [read post]
