Search for: "Turner v. Steele." Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2021, 5:41 am by Unreported Opinions
Contract — Subcontract — Mechanic’s lien This appeal involves the scope and performance of a structural and miscellaneous steel subcontract between Buffalo Structural Steel Construction Corporation (“Buffalo”), appellee, and the general contractor, Whiting-Turner Contracting Company (“WhitingTurner”), appellant, for the construction of a grocery distribution center for LIDL US Operations, LLC (“Lidl”), appellant. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 2:52 pm by Robert Kreisman
” Walls filed suit against I-Maxx, Turner Construction, Frontier Construction and against Waukegan Steel Sales. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:00 am by Heidi Meinzer
Grubb Steel Erection, Inc. v. 515 Granby, LLC, mentioned the Florida and Missouri cases and opted not to follow their reasoning. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
The Claimants Michael Turner and Nikki Sanderson have sought permission to appeal the damages they were awarded. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 7:09 am by Christopher G. Hill
Grubb Steel Erection Co. v. 515 Granby, LLC case (full text of opinion in .pdf here), Suburban Grading and Utilities found this out in spades, much to their chagrin. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts The trial in Miller v Turner continued before Collins Rice J, concluding on Wednesday 11 October 2023. [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:51 am by Don Cruse
Tara Turner and Terry Curtis, No. 09-0191 (docket and briefs)) American Home Assurance Co. and Illinois National Insurance Co. v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 1:57 am
Last year the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) remitted to the General Court Joined Cases C‑337/12 P to C‑340/12 P Pi-Design AG, Bodum France SAS and Bodum Logistics A/S v OHIM, Yoshida Metal Industry Co. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 10:33 am
Indeed, while under Article 52(1)(a) CTMR the application date is the seminal moment for the examination invalidity grounds, examiners and Courts are free to consider any material subsequent to the date of application insofar as it enables conclusions to be drawn with regard to the situation as it was on that date [see the CJEU’s orders in Alcon v OHIM, in Case C-192/03P, and Torresan v OHIM, in Case C-5/10]. [read post]
25 May 2010, 9:56 am by Steve Worrall
Steele, Moore Ingram Johnson & Steele, LLP, Marietta, will delve into the subject of Discovery/Evidence. [read post]