Search for: "U S Supreme Court" Results 1 - 20 of 8,674
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Introduction In The Path of the Law, Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., wrote, If you want to know the law and nothing else, you must look at it as a bad man, who cares only for the material consequences which such knowledge enables him to predict, not as a good one, who finds his reasons for conduct, whether inside the law or outside of it, in the vaguer sanctions of conscience. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Lutin v Perlberger 2024 NY Slip Op 31879(U) May 29, 2024Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 158734/2023Judge: Dakota D. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:19 pm by Amy Howe
  The post Supreme Court rules U.S. must pay more for Native American tribes’ health care appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 4:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Spirt v Spirt 2024 NY Slip Op 31873(U) May 22, 2024 Supreme Court, New York CountyDocket Number: Index No. 160271/2023 Judge: Gerald Lebovits is not a legal malpractice case. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 1:48 am by INFORRM
Canada The Michael Geist blog covered the landmark decision by the Federal Court in the case of Blacklock’s Reports v Attorney General of Canada. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
" The following includes some relevant excerpts from his order: The Opinion [referring to this court's Corbitt decision] limits the Supreme Court's Superintending Authority over courts under Amendment 80. [read post]
30 May 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Gubler, The Neoclassical View of Corporate Fiduciary Duty Law, 91 U. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
With a List of Suggested Resources**On June 4, 2020 the Washington Supreme Court issued an open letter to the judiciary and legal community recognizing deep-seated and continuing institutional racial injustice and calling for action to address systemic inequities. [read post]
28 May 2024, 6:47 pm by Josh Blackman
" The Supreme Court held that these words were "fighting words," and were not protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
The Guardian’s report can be read here. [read post]