Search for: "U. S. v. Baptiste" Results 1 - 20 of 48
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An attorney from Fischer Brothers; Esq. and a:n attorney from the Pasternak’s Firm, Rochelle Jean-Baptiste (“Mr. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”[5][6] Justice Thomas’s plurality opinion in Mitchell v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
And in further en banc news, the Sixth Circuit will reconsider its decision that a Kentucky prosecutor's striking four African-American veniremen did not violate Batson v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
A Baptist organization may favor Baptists. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:24 am by SHG
Central Baptist Church of Miami, Inc., 404 U. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:09 am by sydniemery
Shannon’s article Prescribing a Balance: The Texas Legislative Responses to Sell v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am by John Elwood
Baptiste, 16-978, Sessions v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]