Search for: "U. S. v. June" Results 1 - 20 of 1,789
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
The Guardian’s report can be read here. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
As neither House of Parliament has raised an objection by 17 May 2024,[1] the way seems to be paved for the Government’s ambitious plans to have the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention[2] implemented and ratified by the end of June 2024.[3] For the first time since the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union (so-called Brexit) on 31 January 2020, a general multilateral instrument would thus once again be put in place to govern the mutual recognition and… [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:23 pm by Thomas James
The Circuit Split The district court’s ruling was consistent with the Second Circuit’s decision in Sohn v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 3:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
After reading the competing claims in Cotton v Kiperman 2024 NY Slip Op 31435(U)April 22, 2024 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: Index No. 515660/2023Judge: Francois A. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Halperin v Held & Hines, LLP 2024 NY Slip Op 31415(U) April 12, 2024Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 652124/2019Judge: Andrea Masley is another in a long line of New York legal malpractice cases arising from real estate troubles. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 11:04 pm by Richard Frank
  Decisions in the other five cases will be handed down before the end of June. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[8] The court went on to observe that “[u]sing enforcement actions to address crypto-assets is simply the latest chapter in a long history of giving meaning to the securities laws through iterative application to new situations. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
I’m going to focus on one of Jack’s earlier works from 1984 when the SEC was just 50 years old. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 8:26 am by Jonathan H. Adler
That is not a great place to be, but that's where we are.The post The Supreme Court's Grant in Trump v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 7:08 pm by Kurt R. Karst
The PTO’s not-even-specious-argument, citing what certainly appears to us to be absolutely irrelevant case law, such as Novartis AG v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
”[26]  In the Commission’s telling, “[a]s part of the settlement process, the Commission and a defendant negotiate terms,” and “if either party disagrees with terms t [read post]