Search for: "U. S. v. Lerner"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2014, 8:39 am
S. 79 n. 18. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:44 am
Lerner v Douglas Elliman Real Estate, Inc. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm
See Lerner and Winderbaum v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 4:36 am
Press 2017).Melissa Murray, Obergefell v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 4:34 am
Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman, LLP, 149 AD3d 788, 789, 51 N.Y.S.3d 183, 185 [2d Dept 2017] quoting Luk Lamellen U Kupplungbau GmbH v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Eskridge & Robin Fretwell Wilson 2018).From SSRN (International and Comparative Law):Asli U. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 3:50 am
Kupplungbau GmbH v Lerner, 166 AD2d at 506-507). [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:11 am
Kupplungbau GmbH v Lerner, 166 AD2d 505, 506-507 [2d Dept 1990]). [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 1:39 pm
V., Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 9:42 am
The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom issued a ruling on the status of equity partners in law firms that flies in the face a recent ruling by the Supreme Court of Canada.On May 22, the SCC ruled in McCormick v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:56 am
The Lerner Decision In May 2014, the First Department issued Lerner v Prince (119 AD3d 122 [1st Dept 2014]). [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:05 am
Those efforts could be viewed as “attempt[s] by the attorney to rectify an alleged act of malpractice” (Luk Lamellen U. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 2:34 am
Further to global warming (and Massachusetts v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:59 pm
S. 388 (1983); Witters v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 3:58 am
Kupplungbau GmbH v Lerner, 166 AD2d 505, 506-507 [1990]). [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 11:26 am
”); Lerner v. [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 11:26 am
”); Lerner v. [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 11:26 am
”); Lerner v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 4:12 am
Kupplungbau GmbH v Lerner, 166 AD2d 505, 506-507). [read post]
1 May 2019, 4:31 am
For the continuous representation doctrine to apply, “there must be clear indicia of an ongoing, continuous, developing, and dependent relationship between the client and the attorney which often includes an attempt by the attorney to rectify an alleged act of malpractice” (Luk Lamellen U Kupplungbau GmbH v Lerner, 166 AD2d 505, 507 [2d Dept 1990]). [read post]