Search for: "U. S. v. Marks" Results 1 - 20 of 1,321
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Trump v. Anderson, 601 U. S. ____ (2024): Text of Slip Opinion
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Concluding that it4 TRUMP v. [read post]
Law at the End of the Day - https://lcbackerblog.blogspot.com/
Eleventh Circuit Finds ENGINEERED TAX SERVICES Mark Inherently Distinctive
29 May 2020, 4:15 am by Rebecca Tapscott
S. [read post]
IPWatchdog.com | Patent Copyright Trademark - http://www.ipwatchdog.com
When an individual trade mark is not sufficient
26 Sep 2023, 9:24 am by Marcel Pemsel
Applying for the right kind of mark is crucial for successfully defending the trade mark, as the recent General Court judgment in DPG Deutsche Pfandsystem v EUIPO - Užstato sistemos administratorius (case T-774/21) shows. [read post]
IPKat - http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/
"CRASH DUMMIES" Mark Survives Abandonment Claim, TTAB Sustains 2(d) Opposition to Same Mark for Same Goods
24 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
The TTABlog - http://thettablog.blogspot.com/
False Marking and Patent Reform
28 Feb 2010, 5:10 pm by Dennis Crouch
Inc. v. [read post]
Patently-O - http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/
Mark Killenbeck on the History of the Commerce Clause
19 Aug 2012, 1:52 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Mark Killenbeck, author of several excellent legal histories, including one on M’Culloch v. [read post]
Turtle Talk - http://turtletalk.wordpress.com/
U. S. Supreme Court Diminishes the Administrative State
1 Jul 2024, 3:29 am by Charles Sartain
The U. [read post]
Energy & the Law - http://www.energyandthelaw.com
TTAB Dismisses SUPERCORE Opposition: No Likelihood of Confusion with U-CORE and No Intent to Deceive in Misuse of the “R” Symbol
17 Oct 2018, 3:11 am
Inc. v. [read post]
The TTABlog - http://thettablog.blogspot.com/
U.S. v. Rahimi – The Discussion Continues
4 Oct 2024, 9:00 am by Aaron Weems
Supreme Court case, U.S. v. [read post]
Pennsylvania Family Law - http://pafamilylaw.foxrothschild.com/
RICHARD BROOKS v. STATE OF MARYLAND
6 Mar 2020, 1:17 pm by Daily Record Staff
While Hatmaker’s body was never found, his blood was found on two motor vehicles: on the bumper of a U-Haul truck ... [read post]
On the Record - http://thedailyrecord.com/ontherecord/
Qui Tam Provision of False Marking Statute is Unconstitutional
24 Feb 2011, 7:20 am by The Docket Navigator
The court granted defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's qui tam false marking claim "on the ground that the qui tam provision of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
Docket Report Patent Infringement Blog - http://docketreport.blogspot.com/
U.S. Supreme Court, Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com B.V., Docket No. 19-46, J. Ginsburg
16 Jul 2020, 1:27 pm
TrademarkBooking.comGeneric NameGeneric Name to ConsumersEvidence of Consumer PerceptionService Mark v. [read post]
Frederic Borel - http://fredericborel.blogspot.ch/
The Supremes refine Barker v. Wingo
9 Mar 2009, 2:07 pm
Wingo, 407 U. [read post]
CAAFlog - http://caaflog.blogspot.com/
U.S. Supreme Court, Peter v. NantKwest, Inc., Docket No. 18-801, J. Sotomayor, Unanimous
29 Jan 2020, 2:04 pm
S., at ___ (slip op., at 3) (citing Arcambel v. [read post]
Frederic Borel - http://fredericborel.blogspot.ch/
Precedential No. 21: TTAB Upholds Fraud Claim Against Distributor of Massage Chairs Who Registered Manufacturer's Mark FUJIIRYOKI
2 Aug 2021, 3:29 am
Bic Corp., 18 U,S,P,Q,2d 1382, 1386 (TTAB 1991); Leatherwood Scopes Int’l Inc. v. [read post]
The TTABlog - http://thettablog.blogspot.com/
“BLESSED”: Owning a Trade Mark Is Not Always a Blessing
28 Dec 2022, 5:02 am by Michaela Ring (Hoffmann Eitle)
Urt. v. 2.6.2022 – 6 U 40/22, GRUR-RS 2022, 22858   The trade mark owner claimed that his trade mark rights had been infringed, and he applied for injunctive remedies. [read post]
KluwerTrademarkBlog - http://trademarkblog.kluweriplaw.com/
Sveen v Melin Is First Contracts Clause Case in Decades
5 Sep 2018, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The Supreme Court addressed the Constitution’s Contracts Clause for the first time in 25 years in Sveen v Melin, 584 U. [read post]
Constitutional Law Reporter - https://constitutionallawreporter.com/
Frank S. Ravitch and Larry Catá Backer Discuss Carson v. Makin, --- U.S. (No. 20–1088; June 21, 2022), Establishment, Free Exercise and the Constitutional Obligation to Fund Religious Education
21 Jul 2022, 6:52 pm
S. ___; and Espinoza v. [read post]
Law at the End of the Day - https://lcbackerblog.blogspot.com/
TTAB Affirms Functionality Refusal of Door Channel Configuration Mark
9 May 2016, 3:17 am
" The mark comprises the configuration of the U-shaped channel that runs the length of the door. [read post]
The TTABlog - http://thettablog.blogspot.com/
Precedential No. 29: Licensee's Prior Common Law Use Established Priority for "SNORE MD" Mark
1 Nov 2021, 7:19 am
Fallon v. [read post]
The TTABlog - http://thettablog.blogspot.com/