Search for: "U.S. v. Polk"
Results 1 - 20
of 223
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Secondary sanctions target transactions conducted by non-U.S. persons outside U.S. jurisdiction (and therefore not in violation of U.S. direct sanctions) by threatening that persons engaging in such transactions may themselves be placed on U.S. sanctions lists. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Freed, — U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
The U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Rev. 965 (2017); Atherton v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Zilberberg, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Thursday, February 22, 2024 Tags: California, Climate Disclosure, CSRD, SB253, SB261, SEC, TCFD Hacking Corporate Reputations Posted by Pat Akey, University of Toronto and INSEAD, on Thursday, February 22, 2024 Tags: Corporate Reputation, Corporate Social Responsibility, CSR, Cyberattack, Data Breach Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Zilberberg, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Thursday, February 22, 2024 Tags: California, Climate Disclosure, CSRD, SB253, SB261, SEC, TCFD Hacking Corporate Reputations Posted by Pat Akey, University of Toronto and INSEAD, on Thursday, February 22, 2024 Tags: Corporate Reputation, Corporate Social Responsibility, CSR, Cyberattack, Data Breach Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:30 am
Uyeda, U.S. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:30 am
Uyeda, U.S. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s landmark 2018 decision Ohio v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
. ― The changes eliminate elements of the 2019 Nonbank Designation Guidance that incorporated and addressed certain holdings of the MetLife v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 3:11 am
Top U.S. law firm Davis Polk announced in an internal email that it had rescinded letters of employment for three law students at Harvard and Columbia universities who signed on to organizational statements about Israel, one of the latest responses to open letters from university groups about the Israel-Hamas conflict that have roiled university donors, employers, alumni and students. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
July 3, 2023, settled) SEC v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 4:41 am
“A determination whether to grant such leave is within the Supreme Court’s broad discretion, and the exercise of that discretion will not be lightly disturbed” (Gitlin v Chirinkin, 60 AD3d 901, 902; see U.S. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
The narrow law enforcement exception to the four-day reporting requirement is available only if there is a “substantial risk to national security or public safety” and only with the approval of the U.S. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 11:34 am
A hearing in the case has been set for July 13 (SEC v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
This post comes to us from Davis, Polk & Wardwell LLP. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
This post comes to us from Davis, Polk & Wardwell LLP. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:23 pm
U.S. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Posner, Cooley LLP, on Monday, December 19, 2022 Tags: board diversity, California, Crest v. [read post]
