Search for: "U.S. v. Tart"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2024, 1:24 pm
Recognizing that federal caselaw in this area is not binding, it nevertheless adopts the reasoning of the United States Supreme Court in U.S. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 12:33 pm
Tart, 372 N.C. 73, 79, 824 S.E.2d 837, 841 (2019). [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 3:40 pm
The U.S. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 7:06 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Tewinkle v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 10:58 am
Tart, 955 F. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:12 am
Under the descriptive fair use doctrine, a trademark can be used in its dictionary sense to describe the speaker’s own goods and services—that’s why Ocean Spray can market its cranberry juice as “sweet-tart” without infringing Nestle’s SweeTart trademark for candy. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:24 pm
U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:00 pm
" POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 5:06 am
The case, Bond v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 9:54 am
The argument in Bond v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:36 am
Hedden, 149 U.S. 309 (1893). [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 12:26 pm
At oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 10:19 am
Benedict v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 8:16 pm
Later, Deputy U.S. [read post]
6 May 2010, 4:12 pm
Fritz Zwicky, the tart-tongued scientist (discoverer of, among other things, supernovae and neutron stars) was wont to label his critics in the astrophysical world (of whom there were many) “spherical bastards. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Hydrick, 500 F.3d at 1001; see also United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 7:42 pm
Warner & Co. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 12:54 am
Scruggs and Backstrom each pleaded guilty last week in U.S. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 3:59 pm
" Alcala v. [read post]
