Search for: "U.S. v. Thomas Francis"
Results 1 - 20
of 97
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 3:35 pm
U.S. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm
Francis Collins, in an email to Dr. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Thomas any better? [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Thomas v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
But in North Carolina, U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:48 am
Jacobson v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
” But the full U.S. [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
The U.S. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Fugitive in Massive Navy Bribery Case Caught in Venezuela Yahoo News – Associated Press | Published: 9/22/2022 Leonard Francis, a Malaysian defense contractor nicknamed “Fat Leonard” who orchestrated one of the largest bribery scandals in U.S. military history, was arrested in Venezuela after fleeing before his sentencing. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
”[5][6] Justice Thomas’s plurality opinion in Mitchell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am
The main residence of Veraton, circa 1907. [read post]
3 May 2022, 4:18 am
RUSSIA, UKRAINE – U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 8:50 pm
The Supreme Court of British Columbia wrestled with this very issue in a recent decision in Thomas and Saik’uz First Nation v Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:59 pm
A v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am
Data Privacy and Data Protection U.S. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
In Fulton v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm
Although no rule or statute prohibits side switching, state and federal courts have exercised what they have called an inherent power to supervise and control ethical breaches by lawyers and expert witnesses.[1] The Wang Test Although certainly not the first case on side-switching, the decision of a federal trial court, in Wang Laboratories, Inc. v Toshiba Corp., has become a key precedent on disqualification of expert witnesses.[2] The test spelled out in the Wang case has generally been… [read post]
