Search for: "U.S. v. Wang"
Results 1 - 20
of 333
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
”[37] More specifically, the U.S. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:16 am
, Bradford v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
To give the reader some idea of the artificial flavor of Egilman’s pomposity, paragraph 8 of his remarkable declaration avers” “My views on the scientific standards for the determination of cause-effect relationships (medical epistemology) have been cited by the Massachusetts Supreme Court (Vassallo v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
With respect to the former, it’s been referred to as one of the largest financial frauds in U.S. history, and it’s principal architect was recently sentenced to 25 years in federal prison.[1] Tellingly, John Ray, who was appointed FTX CEO as part of its bankruptcy proceedings, observed that “in his 40 years of legal and restructuring experience,” which included the Enron bankruptcy, he had never seen “such a complete failure of corporate controls and such a… [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 3:50 am
Indeed, the Court in Wang v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:07 am
Circuit held that derivative family members must be counted separately in the EB-5 context in Wang v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:33 am
By Roxana Wang Chinese cultural property has a history of being vulnerable to illicit trafficking. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
., 2022; Gompers and Wang, 2017; Lerner et al., 2021). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:39 pm
Unfortunately, both the U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:59 am
” Japan said it has asked the United States to suspend all non-emergency V-22 Osprey flights over its region after one of the U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
On November 14, 2023, the U.S. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:31 pm
Hackett, Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 3:24 pm
Troops, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
The narrow law enforcement exception to the four-day reporting requirement is available only if there is a “substantial risk to national security or public safety” and only with the approval of the U.S. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
SB 261 would embrace a considerably larger universe than the proposed SEC rules because it would cover all large companies, not just the public reporting ones under the SEC’s jurisdiction.[16] Most U.S. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 5:42 pm
Pix Credit here (EU AI Act)It is always interesting to watch the ways in which U.S. and Chinese administrative trajectories respond to similar challenges that move closer to the top of items of regulatory interest to their respective government organs. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 3:58 am
EPA held that the state could challenge the U.S. [read post]
