Search for: "UNITED SHOE MACHINERY CORP. v. U.S."
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2011, 5:22 am
McIntyre Machinery v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:48 pm
The court distinguished Hanover Shoe in its discussion of Midwestern Machinery Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:13 pm
United Shoe Machinery Corp., 392 U.S. 481 (1968), the Supreme Court rejected an offensive use of a pass on theory, in which indirect purchasers allege that they are injured because overcharges were passed on to them. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:13 pm
United Shoe Machinery Corp., 392 U.S. 481 (1968), the Supreme Court rejected an offensive use of a pass on theory, in which indirect purchasers allege that they are injured because overcharges were passed on to them. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 12:47 pm
Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945) (where the defendant wasn’t very “international”), and World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 3:42 pm
United Shoe Machinery Corp., 392 U.S. 481 (1968), the United States Supreme Court held that federal antitrust defendants generally may not assert a pass-on defense, because even a direct purchaser who passes on an overcharge, will likely be damaged in other ways by defendants’ violation of antitrust law. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 5:33 am
McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am
McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 9:07 pm
Dubilier Condenser Corp., 289 U.S. 178, 199 (1933). [read post]
24 May 2022, 8:31 am
United Shoe Machinery Corp., 392 U. [read post]
24 May 2022, 8:31 am
United Shoe Machinery Corp., 392 U. [read post]