Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. PADILLA"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2023, 6:37 am
Cuba represents a most interesting variant of Marxist-Leninist state organization. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 7:06 pm
The challenges are especially critical in Latin America. [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 2:28 pm
Cir. 2020)… Indeed, particularly where the statute in question regards such a "severe 'penalty'" as deportation, Padilla v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
Two separate classes of landowners are included in the suit as well as the United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
Two separate classes of landowners are included in the suit as well as the United States. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm
Canada In the case of Zoutman v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm
New York politicians are expected to vote to force the city’s police force to divulge the surveillance technology it uses, one of many reforms of law enforcement being considered across the United States. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:45 pm
Border are Humane and Effective (RI Blog, Sept. 2019) [text]Federal Court Rules Detained Immigrant Children Must Receive Clean Water, Edible Food, and Soap (Immigration Impact Blog, Aug. 2019) [text]Former IJs File Amicus Brief in Padilla v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:00 pm
Texas, Fort Worth Division.May 16, 2017.FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGEHAL R. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 9:16 am
On March 6, Dred Scott v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 6:24 am
State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 6:06 am
’United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm
Louisiana, 14-280 (third relist since the Court received the state’s brief in opposition); Tolliver v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 12:30 pm
Padilla, which requires anyone detained within the United States to sue their immediate custodian (which, as a result of personal jurisdiction rules, has the effect of all-but requiring the suit to be brought in the district in which the detainee is held). [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 11:56 am
One year later, the United States Supreme Court decided Padilla v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 12:45 pm
This is the requirement of the Padilla v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:00 am
That is, Congress should state explicitly that detention authority under the AUMF and the NDAA does not extend to any persons captured within the territory of the United States. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 8:33 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 6:58 am
Wallace and United States v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:31 pm
It's a great thing about America. [read post]
