Search for: "US v. Clarke" Results 1 - 20 of 3,098
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2024, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
The Excalibur Litigation resulted in a written judgment (“the Excalibur Judgment” and, along with the Transcript, the “Excalibur Material”) delivered by Christopher Clarke LJ dated 13 December 2013 ([2013] EWHC 2767) [8]. [read post]
18 May 2024, 2:48 pm by Larry
The basis for this decision is explained in Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
The case emerged from complaints by Nebraskans that the state was improperly subjecting mental health patients to segregation from general society, in violation of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) and the 1999 US Supreme Court decision Olmstead v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:32 am by Mary B. McCord
” A few days later, Troupis did just that, and sent Chesebro’s memo to Trump Campaign attorney Justin Clark. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Cuomo, Respondent,vNew York State Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government, Appellant.Calendar Date:February 16, 2024Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Clark, Reynolds Fitzgerald, McShan and Powers, JJ.Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Dustin J. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Cuomo, Respondent,vNew York State Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government, Appellant.Calendar Date:February 16, 2024Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Clark, Reynolds Fitzgerald, McShan and Powers, JJ.Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Dustin J. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:12 am by Scott Bomboy
Although some protestors may argue that camping is protected symbolic expression, a Supreme Court decision from 1982, Clark v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 1:25 pm by David Bernstein
" The Supreme Court ruled that protesters do not have a right to camp out even on public property devoted to public use, like national parks, in Clark v. [read post]
(For discussion of why “shouting down,” even though expressive, is not protected from government prohibition, see this recent column by one of us.)Calling physical blockage peaceful because it does not involve overt and affirmative violent assaults on third parties does nothing to alter its lack of constitutional status. [read post]