Search for: "US v. Currence"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,485
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2024, 11:09 am
Consider the case of U.S. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Canada, Mexico, Argentina, and Jamaica successfully joined us in the move. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 9:05 am
Final report: Draft Implementing Technical Standards on the reporting on asset-referenced tokens under Article 22(7) of MiCAR and on e-money tokens denominated in a currency that is not an official currency of a Member State pursuant to Article 58(3) of that Regulation and Annexes I, II, III, IV and V. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 12:37 pm
Soldal v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
On 10 April 2018, MUR sent a force majeure notice, noting that payment in US dollars (as required under the contract) was prevented by US sanctions. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
Fast forward almost 90 years, in Seila Law v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 6:36 am
The respondent as payor rejected the force majeure notice and offered to pay in Euros instead of US dollars and to bear any additional costs or exchange rate losses in converting the currencies. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm
OCC’s Letter on Uniform Federal Banking Standards On November 9, 2023, the General Counsel of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”) issued a letter to the CEOs of all national banks and federal savings associations (“FSAs”) addressing uniform federal banking standards.[13] In the letter, the OCC explains that it is aware that some states have passed laws or taken other actions that “purport to apply to national… [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:35 am
[7] Maslowski et al. v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:41 pm
(Reason)Today, in Culley v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:32 am
State v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 8:31 pm
Seilkop v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 10:35 am
It's okay for a magistrate to use some discretion in determining what exchange rate to use. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:22 pm
In SIA v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Despite its preliminary nature, the Proposed Regulation serves as a useful indication of the form that the final regulation may take. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:36 pm
§ 1.263(a)-4(b)(1)(v) [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 2:45 pm
In 1987, the Supreme Court broadly held in McNally v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:27 am
For more information on SEC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:39 am
More than two decades after the shock of Bush v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:26 am
The Supreme Court’s Muldrow v. [read post]
