Search for: "US v. Curry" Results 1 - 20 of 400
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2024, 5:05 am by Laura
In England and Wales, we use the equivalent terminology of about divorce applications, conditional orders and final orders. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by Preston Lim
Canadian academics have suggested that Canada’s use of legal tools could even result in a “Grotian moment”—that is, a “paradigm-shifting development in which new rules and doctrines of customary international law emerge with unusual rapidity and acceptance. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
”   Both clauses use a “catch-all” term, but they differ slightly from one another in terms of their prepositions—a difference to which Trump would attach great significance. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
[Congress are] too numerous for an executive; nor can any additional powers be sufficient to enable them to protect us against foreign invasion. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am by INFORRM
On Thursday 18 January 2024, there was an application in the data protection case of Sutton v Currys. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Hikvision cameras have been banned by the US government since 2019 and have been criticised for their alleged role in mass surveillance of the Uyghurs in China. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 7:32 am by Pablo Arredondo
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK  December 21, 2024 Genesis Technology v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 7:32 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal procedure — Witness testimony — GPS data Convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County of second-degree murder and use of a firearm in the commission of a crime of violence, Davon Dominic Curry, appellant, presents for our review a single issue: whether the court erred in allowing a witness “to […] The post DAVON DOMINIC CURRY v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
Does the fact that a defendant was involved in political activity using campaign funds affect the analysis? [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 4:02 am by SHG
This sounds remarkably like the “actual malice” standard of Times v. [read post]