Search for: "US v. Daniel Lewi"
Results 1 - 20
of 205
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2024, 2:01 pm
Indeed, the majority opinion doesn’t contain a single mention of last month’s NRA v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm
On Thursday 13 June 2024, there were hearings in Nicholas James Gwilliam v (1) Stephen Thomas Freeman (2) John William Freeman QB-2021-000981 and Tyndal v Obisulu KB-2024-001333. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:37 am
So start there as opposed to the trope that streaming platforms are doing us a favor by paying us at all, Daniel Ek saved the music business, and all the other iconographic claptrap. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Any use, or any use within the last seven or 30 days, would be fairly irrelevant to the pathophysiology of a cerebral hemorrhage. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am
The offender sent an indecent photo of himself to a woman in her 60s using WhatsApp and a child through iMessage. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 4:44 am
Urias v Daniel P. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:44 am
Harvard professor Jonathan Zittrain and l were sitting down with Daniel Lewis and Nik Reed, the founders of a legal research startup named Ravel Law, along with lawyers from Harvard’s Office of General Counsel, Debevoise & Plimpton and Gundersen Dettmer. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:21 am
The originators of the Caselaw Access Project: Nik Reed and Daniel Lewis, then the cofounders of Ravel Law; Adam Ziegler, then director of Harvard’s Library Innovation Lab; and Jonathan Zittrain, Harvard Law professor. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 8:50 am
Speakers include Harvard Law Professor Jonathan Zittrain; former Library Innovation law director Adam Ziegler; Ravel Law cofounders Nik Reed and Daniel Lewis; Free Law Project founder Mike Lissner; Legal Information Institute executive director Sara Frug; Angela Jaffee, account director at vLex and former national programs administrator for the Administrative Office of the United States Courts; Carl Malamud, founder of Public.Resource.Org; Harvard Law Professor Alexandra Natapoff;… [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am
As mentioned above, on 27 February 2024, judgment on meaning was handed down in Dyson Technology Ltd & Anor v Channel Four Television Corporation & Anor [2024] EWHC 400 (KB) by Lewis J. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 3:23 pm
Facebook Section 230 Ends Demonetized YouTuber’s Lawsuit–Lewis v. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm
The Brett Wilson Media Law Blog published an article analysing the recent judgement of HHJ Lewis in the case of Iqbal v GEO TV Ltd [2023] EWHC 3024 (KB). [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 2:31 pm
"] From Elden v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
In Beltran v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
On 27 November 2023, HHJ Lewis dismissed the defendant’s application for summary judgement in the case of Iqbal v Geo TV Limited [2023] EWHC 3024 (KB). [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am
The bill would also clarify rules for the use of machine-learning technologies and personal data for scientific research. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 1:12 am
This incident adds to a growing number of climate-related protests aimed at high-profile artworks across various global museums, which have led stakeholders in the art world to reevaluate their risk management strategies and insurance coverages for potential liabilities associated with these mounting threats.[2] Acts of Defacement as Protest The tactics employed by the protesters vary widely, from splashing paint and throwing soup to attempting to glue themselves to the art.[3] For the most part,… [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 8:38 am
Facebook Section 230 Ends Demonetized YouTuber’s Lawsuit–Lewis v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:45 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs; Pennsylvania State University | 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct) || lcb11@psu.edu First I want to thank Marcelo Thompson, Han Zhu, and Dean Fu Hualing, and all those who organized this workshop. [read post]
Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A. // Protecting Privacy and Privilege Rights in Non-Party Requests for Documents
15 Jun 2023, 12:01 pm
In workers’ compensation OJCC Case No. 23-002107, JCC Daniel Lewis entered this thoughtful order in response to the Claimant’s Objections to Subpoenas Duces Tecum/Records Custodian Depositions: In view of the claimant’s objection, the employer/carrier may schedule the depositions of the records custodians. [read post]
