Search for: "US v. Diaz" Results 1 - 20 of 862
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2024, 9:12 pm
  If the Court were to adopt the view that this is not enough to render a lab report testimonial, then it would be a simple matter for labs always to avoid the rule of Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
.), or where the arbitrator " 'manifestly disregard[s]' the substantive law applicable to the parties' dispute" (Schiferle v Capital Fence Co., Inc., 155 AD3d 122, 127 [4th Dept 2017], quoting Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471, 479 [2006], cert dismissed 548 US 940 [2006]; see Matter of Gerber v Goldberg Segalla LLP, 199 AD3d 1354, 1355 [4th Dept 2021]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
.), or where the arbitrator " 'manifestly disregard[s]' the substantive law applicable to the parties' dispute" (Schiferle v Capital Fence Co., Inc., 155 AD3d 122, 127 [4th Dept 2017], quoting Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471, 479 [2006], cert dismissed 548 US 940 [2006]; see Matter of Gerber v Goldberg Segalla LLP, 199 AD3d 1354, 1355 [4th Dept 2021]). [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
”  This year’s recipient is Gerardo Con Díaz, Yale University, for Patent Law and the Materiality of Inventions in the California Oil Industry: The Story of Halliburton v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
Many agencies even have an online portal that makes it easier, or you can use MuckRock’s records request tool. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Shea Denning
Diaz-Tomas regarding dismissal with leave, the Court’s grant of review in the substitute analyst case of Smith v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 1:28 pm by John Elwood
As anticipated, the court granted review in one-time relist Diaz v. [read post]
The US Supreme Court on Monday agreed to consider the evidentiary scope of expert witness testimony for demonstrating intent in a “blind mule” drug trafficking case, Diaz v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 7:45 am by Amy Howe
Over a dissent from the court’s three liberal justices, the justices denied review in Johnson v. [read post]