Search for: "US v. Hancock" Results 1 - 20 of 245
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2024, 1:56 am by INFORRM
The software recognised commuters’ images and used the information to predict their age, gender and potential emotions, with the suggestion that the data could be used in future for advertising purposes. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
As mentioned above, on Wednesday 12 June 2024, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in George v Cannell and another [2024] UKSC 19 On the same day there was a preliminary issues trial before Collins Rice J in the case of Bridgen MP v Hancock MP KB-2023-002309. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:55 am by INFORRM
Netflix and filmmaker Ava DuVernay have settled a defamation lawsuit over 2019 drama series When They See Us. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
New York’s use of its famed Form “RB089” continues to work against some parties seeking full Board review. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am by INFORRM
On 20 March 2024, Steyn J handed down judgement in the defendant’s application to strike out the claim in the case of Bridgen v Hancock [2024] EWHC 623 (KB). [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media As discussed further below, the US House of Representatives has passed a landmark bill that could see TikTok banned in the USA. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
It comes on the heels of new guidance from the ICO on biometric use in the workplace. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am by INFORRM
The ICO also published new guidance for all organisations considering using people’s biometric data. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Under the new policy by Meta, labels acknowledging the use of AI will appear on users’ screens when they click on ads. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
IPSO 17778-23 Hancock v Daily Mirror, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18473-23 Clunes v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 14369-23 The MacDougall family v Mail Online, 3 Harassment (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), 10 Clandestine devices and subterfuge (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 18053-23 Blackman v The National, 1… [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:18 pm by Giles Peaker
Secondly: in the second part of the decision in Khan, the Court of Appeal resolved the tension between Avon Ground Rents Ltd v Child (2018) UKUT 204 (LC) and John Romans Park Homes Ltd v Hancock, 17 October 2019 (His Honour Judge Martin Rodger KC), unreported. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
  The defamation claim was brought by Andrew Bridgen MP against former health minister, Matt Hancock MP. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:32 am by centerforartlaw
Provenance research initiatives at the Metropolitan Museum of Art (the Met) identified 53 works of art that were misappropriated by the Nazis that were “restituted to their rightful owners” and then purchased by or donated to the museum.[16] One example is a work by Claude Monet titled The Parc Monceau, painted in 1878.[17] The Nazis seized the painting from the bank of Jewish collector Alfred Lindenbaum and transported it to the Jeu de Paume, an art center in Paris the Nazis… [read post]