Search for: "US v. Johnson"
Results 1 - 20
of 6,460
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
What constitutes a public purpose is defined broadly and "encompasses any use which contributes to the health, safety, general welfare, convenience or prosperity of the community" (Matter of 225 Front St., Ltd. v City of Binghamton, 61 AD3d 1155, 1157 [3d Dept 2009] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Johnson v Town of Caroga, 162 AD3d 1353, 1355 [3d Dept 2018]; see Matter of Court St. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
What constitutes a public purpose is defined broadly and "encompasses any use which contributes to the health, safety, general welfare, convenience or prosperity of the community" (Matter of 225 Front St., Ltd. v City of Binghamton, 61 AD3d 1155, 1157 [3d Dept 2009] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Johnson v Town of Caroga, 162 AD3d 1353, 1355 [3d Dept 2018]; see Matter of Court St. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 12:19 pm
Tell us more about your professional interests. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 3:04 pm
The opinion in Texas v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 12:52 pm
App. 2019) 2019 WL 3296947); land use (INJ, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:11 am
For further information regarding this act, contact Liskow attorneys Greg Johnson, Clare Bienvenu, Emily von Qualen and Colin North and visit our Environmental practice page. 1In an April 1 letter to a Louisiana Senator, the EPA Region 6 Administrator stated the following: “EPA has concerns that the [CAMRA] may preclude the use of any credible evidence to determine compliance under the [CAA] and may conflict with Louisiana’s federally approved Title V and… [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 4:10 am
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, concerns mifepristone, a widely used abortion drug that is used to end pregnancy through 10 weeks gestation. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am
Dame Victoria Sharp and Mr Justice Johnson dismissed most of Assange’s legal arguments but said that unless “satisfactory” assurances were given by the US, he would be able to bring an appeal on three grounds. [read post]
25 May 2024, 9:11 am
See, e.g., US Dominion v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:00 am
Johnson Corp. v Indemnity Ins. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:00 am
Johnson Corp. v Indemnity Ins. [read post]
23 May 2024, 6:03 pm
Johnson and Shaw v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 10:28 am
Particularly, the Uniform Partnership Act in Illinois imposes a trust duty (Johnson v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am
In the wake of the announced boycott against Columbia University, I posed several questions to Judge Matthew Solomson of the U.S. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:38 am
Johnson). [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:01 pm
” The Supreme Court held in International Union, UAW v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
Being a devolved matter, this step requires the Central Government to obtain the approval of a Northern Ireland Department (Roinn i dTuaisceart Éireann) and the Scottish Ministers (Mhinistearan na h-Alba).[31] Furthermore, this approach also implies that there will be no comparable exclusion of insurance matters as under the HCCH 2005 Convention.[32] However, the Responses contemplated making use of the bilateralisation mechanism in relation to the Russian Federation upon its… [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:32 am
In March, our team at Georgetown Law’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection—along with our co-counsel at Law Forward and Stafford Rosenbaum, LLP—settled Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]