Search for: "US v. Kale" Results 1 - 20 of 45
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Is a particular donut tastier than a particular kale salad is healthy? [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 4:43 am by SHG
NARAL Pro-Choice America has used “birthing people” in lieu of “women. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 4:40 am
August 25, 2020 - 2 PM: Grant Toland, Alexander Prenta and Russ Bennet v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Joe Whitworth
Authorities traced the kale to four different growers in southern Sweden. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 3:12 pm
  But it is useful, as one examines the priestly role in modern western states, to consider a more traditional relationship between the priest and the state. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 7:11 pm
For this post I include an excellent short essay, "48 Hour Rule: Right to Privilege; The Judiciary Should Let Us Know! [read post]
4 May 2018, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
For example, in a recent case out of Fairfax County, Artitech, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 1:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  (2) uses to inform consumers/the market about aspects of the D’s product—descriptive fair uses, nominative fair use, resale uses. (3) a special subset is use of the mark in technological contexts, such as metatags/AdWords. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Fair use—maybe it should be unitary. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 4:10 am by Jim Singer
This happened when a Vermont company’s applied to register the EAT MORE KALE mark for use on apparel and other products. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 10:26 pm by Steve Baird
Your deft use of the social media shame-wagon? [read post]
4 May 2014, 10:54 pm by Steve Baird
For a comparison of nutritional facts concerning grouper v. walleye, see here. [read post]