Search for: "US v. Mark Bristow"
Results 1 - 20
of 59
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
From Bristow v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm
The Ninth Circuit in Marks v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 12:04 am
The event will be held on 23 January 2020 from 6pm to 8pm at Bristows LLP, 100 Victoria Embankment, EC4Y 0DH, London. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 7:45 am
Further, if a patent is granted early, it will expire early and the public will gain benefits earlier.The Warner Lambert v Generics case again raised the question of whether a patentee can mark out a field in which he will have protection while undertaking further research. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 3:04 am
Rightsholders will be able to bring a claim of infringement in relation to preparatory acts in the use of packaging and labels.Registration of Non-Traditional Trade MarksJeremy Blum from Bristows nicely complemented Marks talk, by going into more detail on the removal of “graphical representation” requirement. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:27 am
Panama| Will trade mark law stop Marine Le Pen's new campaign? [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 1:00 am
The scope of protection is even less precise for trade marks when use is taken into account and, of course, the registers do not contain unregistered rights. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 3:41 pm
Part 2 | It may be use, but is it trade mark use? [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 5:11 am
One of them was the fact that applicant acted as a licensee using a similar mark for identical goods. [read post]
16 May 2017, 2:55 am
Mikolaj discusses how it can help us understand the role of trade marks that emerged from a given moment of history. [read post]
9 May 2017, 12:59 pm
I Can you use the Pope's image on T-shirts and gadgets? [read post]
8 May 2017, 10:17 am
GuestKats and InternKat I BREAKING: Birss J hands down first FRAND decision in Unwired Planet v Huawei I Retromark: a year in trade marks I Can a public domain artwork be registered as a trade mark or would that be contrary to public policy and morality? [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 11:30 pm
Jeremy Blum (Bristows) and Andrew Butcher (Bristows) explain: "Given that we can count on one hand the number of judgments on the topic of trade mark infringement in the context of key word advertising (by our count they are L’Oréal, M&S, Lush, Mr Spicy) we were unsurprisingly eager to receive last Friday’s decision of Mr Justice Carr in Victoria Plum Limited v Victorian Plumbing Ltd [2016] EWHC 2911 (Ch). [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:44 am
This was considered by many to be a significantly more formulaic approach than that adopted in other jurisdictions, such as the US. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 9:10 am
Thanks to Bristows patent litigator Vanessa Rieu for the story. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 4:29 am
Nicola examines some of its more dystopian predicted effects. * GS Media: IPKat/Bristows rapid response seminar Katfriend Lucie Fortune reports on the rapid response seminar at which Eleonora was joined by Aimee Nisbet, Nicholas Saunders and Theo Savvides on the panel, which was chaired by Mark Brown. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 4:59 am
Chaired by Mark Brown (Bristows), the panel featured Aimee Nisbet (Hearst Corporation), Eleonora Rosati (University of Southampton and IPKat), Nicholas Saunders (Brick Court Chambers) and Theo Savvides (Bristows). [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 11:03 am
Linking & Copyright rapid response event on 13 September: come join us! [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:20 pm
Luke Maunder (Bristows LLP) reports on the decision which will be interest to anyone who loves color combination trade marks or trying to figure out how to precisely and clearly ring fence the scope of trade mark protection Conference Report: Should you arbitrate FRAND rates? [read post]
