Search for: "US v. Mark Phillips"
Results 1 - 20
of 454
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2018, 4:57 am
The involved marks have been in concurrent use since 2013. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 11:40 am
Under Article 12 of the Trade mark directive a trade mark is lost if it is not used genuinely for five years.Silberquelle v Maselli was a preliminary ruling case on the interpretation of the Directive. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 11:40 am
Under Article 12 of the Trade mark directive a trade mark is lost if it is not used genuinely for five years.Silberquelle v Maselli was a preliminary ruling case on the interpretation of the Directive. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 5:15 pm
Ms Phillips countered that the privilege was disapplied in these circumstances by section 72 of the Senior Courts Act 1981. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:00 am
Ms Phillips countered that the privilege was disapplied in these circumstances by the Senior Courts Act 1981, s 72. [read post]
20 May 2014, 9:12 am
Useful Precedent Hewitt v. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 11:32 pm
This contribution suggests that scents may be more easily registered in the near future as a consequence of the EU reform of trade marks and of some technological innovations.Scents are signs because they can convey information (Phillips Electronics NV v Remington Consumer Products Ltd (No. 1) [1998] RPC 283, 298). [read post]
12 May 2012, 4:51 am
Ms Phillips, in turn, relied on the “exception” to PSI in section 72. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 4:33 pm
Perhaps Phillip Morris USA v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 9:06 pm
’ But to paraphrase Mark Twain, the reports were “greatly exaggerated. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 1:18 am
This case before the Supreme Court will mark the latest development in the law surrounding protest. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 4:49 am
Ron Coleman joined us for the third, in Chicago. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 2:43 am
As explained in Phillips, illustrations of the mark as actually used may assist the T.T.A.B. in visualizing other forms in which the mark might appear.As I commented when the CAFC decision came down: The court did not make it clear (at least to me) what the TTAB is supposed to do in considering the possible variations of a standard character mark. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 3:55 pm
"Phillip Morris v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 2:21 pm
Bostic, 2014 NCBC 19; Phillips & Jordan, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:29 pm
Substantial Noninfringing Uses: The Federal Circuit applied the analysis of i4i v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 9:48 am
The IPKat's friend and trade mark enthusiast Keith Farwell (Phillips & Leigh) sadly died towards the end of last year at the very young age of 45. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:01 pm
It’s the invention of Arizona entrepreneur Mark Phillips, whose company hopes to hit the market by spring. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 2:40 am
., Serial No. 87562296 [Section 2(d) refusal of PARADYCE for various clothing items, in view of the registered mark PAR-A-DICE HOTEL-CASINO for overlapping clothing items].September 6, 2018 - 2 PM: Royal Chain, Inc. v Mansur Gavriel LLC, Opposition No. 91214740 [Section 2(d) opposition to registration of MANSUR GAVRIEL for "Handbags; tote bags; purses; wallets," in view of the allegedly previously used mark PHILLIP GAVRIEL for jewelry].September… [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 1:14 pm
While there were certain overlapping characteristics, including the colours used and the animals depicted, the packages could not be called a colourable imitations of Phillip Morris’s copyright. [read post]
