Search for: "US v. Martin Hughe"
Results 1 - 20
of 122
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, February 9, 2024 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of February 2-8, 2024 The Corporate Investment Benefits of Mutual Fund Dual Holdings Posted by Rex Wang Renjie (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam), Patrick Verwijmeren (Erasmus School of Economics), and Shuo Xia (Halle Institute for Economic Research), on Friday, February 2, 2024 Tags: corporate bonds,… [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, February 9, 2024 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of February 2-8, 2024 The Corporate Investment Benefits of Mutual Fund Dual Holdings Posted by Rex Wang Renjie (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam), Patrick Verwijmeren (Erasmus School of Economics), and Shuo Xia (Halle Institute for Economic Research), on Friday, February 2, 2024 Tags: corporate bonds,… [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
Supreme Court, and agreed that the FTC had made out a prima facie case under the burden-shifting framework commonly attributed to Baker Hughes. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 9:27 am
A key Delaware case followed by the court was Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm
No doubt they mean well and aren’t beholden to Access Copyright – but their opinions are so over the top and poorly informed that they have a very bad look:Kate Taylor, May 26, 2023 Hugh Stevens, July 15, 2023 Hugh Steven’s opinion piece conveniently follows up just two days later on the announcement by Access Copyright (“AC”) that it was downsizing and restructuring. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 2:11 am
Humans v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:57 am
Christophe Geiger: different EU/US traditions around regulatory oversight/verification of compliance with key values v private ordering. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am
NGN applied to strike out claims by Hugh Grant and Prince Harry on limitation grounds. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:47 pm
Start w/question of strict liability v. blanket immunity; look at possible regimes; map out core elements of 512, DSA, and 230. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 1:18 pm
EU has been first mover on some things and not others (Art. 17 v notice and takedown). [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Avoids problems of regulatory arbitrage. 230 v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:36 am
SAS Inst. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:59 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
“MARTIN: Sure. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm
The ban was condemned by the EU and the US. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 6:49 pm
Program v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 12:09 pm
Rose Hughes reported on the information. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 7:45 am
Kogan v Martin is explained brilliantly in this guest Kat post here. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm
Interested readers should email conference@5RB.com Please let us know if you have any events which you would like to be listed. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 1:17 am
Alexandra Mezulanik, research assistant at UCL IBIL, examines the much anticipated decision in Martin v Kogan of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales. [read post]
