Search for: "US v. McClendon"
Results 1 - 20
of 42
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am
McClendon, 476 F. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 7:50 am
McClendon, 350 N.C. 630, 635-36 (1999). [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
” McClendon v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 9:38 am
From McClendon v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 6:04 am
When Droste v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:17 am
The Parens Patriae Model In 1892, in Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 12:26 am
McClendon. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 3:27 am
Pierre in turn relied on New York v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 12:03 pm
McClendon, 29 N.Y.S.3d 507 (N.Y. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:09 am
McClendon, 350 N.C. 630 (1999). [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:07 am
” In McClendon v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
That decision catalyzed sex-stereotyping theory as an independent cause of action under Title VII, and it was quickly put to use by effeminate gay men and masculine lesbians who claimed that the hostility and adversity they experienced was sex, rather than sexual orientation, discrimination.Second, in Oncale v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 12:08 pm
’ The court reasoned that, although McClendon's generalized representations regarding criminal suspects' use of electronic devices might be insufficient to substantiate probable cause, the circumstance that defendant had, in fact, used his cell phone to access and store a recording of the altercation was decisive: `Here, the police had concrete proof that the defendant had a cell phone and that he had used it in the manner that the trooper's… [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 10:09 am
McClendon, 350 N.C. 630, 636 (1999), except perhaps to the extent it’s pertinent to the officer’s credibility. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 12:05 pm
Acadian Cypress & Hardwoods, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:28 pm
In the decision of the court in the case of McClendon v Rosetti in 1974, the Federal Judge had to determine who, the claimant or the Property Clerk, is obligated to initiate a lawsuit to regain or retain the property as the case may be. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
But on the 50-year anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
But on the 50-year anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 8:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
