Search for: "US v. Michael Branch" Results 1 - 20 of 766
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
” To the same effect was language from a plurality opinion authored by Justice Antonin Scalia a decade earlier in 1989 in Michael H. v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
Traditionally, the judicial branch retained trust above the executive and legislative branch, but that is no longer true. [read post]
23 May 2024, 3:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
(Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times) Ryan King, a spokesman for the office of the University of California’s president, Michael V. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  But as motivationally useful as this reminder is, another branch of CLS points to deeper structural problems. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
[T]he Logan Act has never been successfully used (indeed, the last indictment under the Act was in … 1803). [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by Guest Author
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
  We're taught in school about checks and balances between the various branches of government, but those lessons tend to leave out the role that civilians play in holding officials accountable. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 5:59 am by Satya Marar
Supreme Court confirmed the legality of Amex’s restraints on steering customers in the 2018 American Express v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
On January 29, 2024, Acting Comptroller of the Currency Michael Hsu spoke at the University of Michigan Stephen M. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
”   Both clauses use a “catch-all” term, but they differ slightly from one another in terms of their prepositions—a difference to which Trump would attach great significance. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
Members of the legislative branch and House and Senate officers are not "Officer[s]" as that term is used in the Constitution's Presidential Succession Clause. [read post]