Search for: "US v. Michael Davis"
Results 1 - 20
of 710
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2024, 7:30 am
Davis, and Helvering v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 9:01 pm
” To the same effect was language from a plurality opinion authored by Justice Antonin Scalia a decade earlier in 1989 in Michael H. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am
That brings us to this week’s new relists. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 12:38 am
Martin Davie, Reflections of an Anglican Theologian: Would a Provincial solution require Parliamentary approval? [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Any use, or any use within the last seven or 30 days, would be fairly irrelevant to the pathophysiology of a cerebral hemorrhage. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
It may be useful to model business behavior in economic terms that assume profit-making as an “objective function. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
Davis L. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 10:43 am
From Norgren v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 8:10 am
The Case In Sedlik v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am
” The regulator found that programmes presented by Jacob Rees-Mogg, Esther McVey and Philip Davies were news segments that which had no “exceptional justification. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Chiodo, Chantelle Cseh, Rebecca Jones, Jacob Damstra, John Adair), and a number of Ontario’s leading firms are represented, including Davies, Lenczner Slaght, Lerners, Torys LLP and Adair, Goldblatt Bieber LLP. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
[5] Commission Guidance Regarding Disclosure Related to Climate Change, Release No. 33-9106 (Feb. 2, 2010) [75 FR 6290 (Feb. 8, 2010)] [6] See Basic Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
1981 – Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom In 1967, homosexuality was in part decriminalised in England and Wales.[2] In 1980, it would be decriminalised under the same conditions in Scotland, and in 1982, in Northern Ireland as well. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
"[19] On February 7, 1861, Representative Davis declared that Floyd had "supplied arms to be forthwith used in making war against their rightful owners. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from foreign… [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Thursday in what is shaping up to be the biggest election case since its ruling nearly 25 years ago in Bush v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Davies, Sarah E. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Davies, Sarah E. [read post]
