Search for: "US v. Montejo"
Results 1 - 20
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
Smith: Reinstates right to effective counsel in capital cases when counsel does not present mitigating evidence during the sentencing phase. 2009 Montejo v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 11:11 am
In the 2009 case Montejo v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 7:14 am
The Court had agreed to review a New Orleans case that presented the issue of whether Miller v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:31 am
Gottlieb had been used up, and defendant’s father paid an additional $520. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 9:52 am
” In determining that defendant did indeed waive his right to counsel, the Court relied on Montejo v Louisiana, ___ US ___; 129 S Ct 2079, 2090; 173 L Ed 2d 955 (2009) which held that the right to counsel may be validly waived in custodial interrogation after the Sixth Amendment right to counsel has attached, even if the … [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 9:00 am
" Montejo v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
” A shortage in one of the key drugs used for lethal injections, has lead to some interesting new challenges, see, e.g. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:41 pm
Jessey Jay Montejo,2010 La. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 11:12 am
Shatzer comes about a year after Montejo v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm
In Montejo v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 10:56 am
Hughen v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 10:03 am
Jackson, the Court noted that that case had been overruled by Montejo v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 3:26 pm
Montejo v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 3:54 am
Montejo v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 3:47 am
Montejo v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 8:59 am
In Berger v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 8:59 am
In Berger v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:36 am
[Note: Personally, after the Montejo and Gant throw downs I don't think anyone up there has any credibility regarding adherence to precedent. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 11:31 am
” Also, on May 26, 2009, my colleague, William Gaskill, planned to use Michigan v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 10:45 am
David Muraskin discusses the Supreme Court's decision in Montejo v. [read post]
