Search for: "US v. Perez-Cruz"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2022, 7:00 pm
As a direct and proximate cause of defendants’ multiple unlawful assaults and batteries upon plaintiffs Galicia, Cruz and Perez, plaintiffs were caused to suffer and experience physical and emotional pain, injuries, discomfort, embarrassment, and humiliation, both past and future.When asked for his take on Trump’s exposure in the litigation, Prof. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
§ 924(c)(3)(B) is unconstitutionally vague; (2) whether conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery has as an element “the use … of physical force against the person or property of another,” 18 U.S.C. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
Navy seamen against companies who made equipment used aboard ships. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
United States, 16-6259, Solano-Cruz v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm
Varela 17-988 Issue: Whether the Federal Arbitration Act forecloses a state-law interpretation of an arbitration agreement that would authorize class arbitration based solely on general language commonly used in arbitration agreements. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
LEXIS 22708 (ED CA, Feb. 24, 2016), a California federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing a suit by a Hindu civil detainee that he was denied his religious vegan diet.In Perez v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 10:42 am
The aide for Democratic members (Lesniak, Cruz-Perez, and Whelan) is Alison Accettola—(609) 847-3700, AAccettola@njleg.org. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:30 am
“It’s a portraiture show,” Cruz reminds us, “but not in the mold that you traditionally think. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 7:53 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 9:15 am
In People v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm
Attorney Roger Cruz. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm
Attorney Roger Cruz. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 8:49 am
Cruz & Co., 475 F Supp 2d 400, 411 [SD NY 2007]). [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 2:47 am
For Further Reading: The Cruz-Perez decision incorrectly flips the lead Supreme Court decision's name: the correct cite is Irizarry v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 17, 2008 US v. [read post]