Search for: "US v. Peter Smith" Results 1 - 20 of 538
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
 LooperLegal Usage: A Modern Style Guide (2018) by Peter ButtLegal Writing: A Judge’s Perspective on the Science and Rhetoric of the Written Word (2020) by Ho [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:28 pm by NARF
Smith (Criminal Jurisdiction; Indian Pueblo Land Act Amendments of 2005) United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 7:01 pm by Stephen Halbrook
Smith explains in his article here, Heller's common use test cannot be escaped by pointing to technological developments or new trends in crime. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Contact us today online or by telephone at (519) 821-5465 to schedule a confidential initial consultation. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Contact us today online or by telephone at (519) 821-5465 to schedule a confidential initial consultation. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
Barrie’s play Peter Pan; or, the Boy Who Wouldn’t Grow Up. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Perhaps the Supreme Court will limit itself to deciding the relatively benign question of required procedures, parsing constitutional text and arguments in the standard manner.[23] Except that recent history suggests that the Court might instead use SEC v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:14 am by Kate O’Sullivan (Bristows)
On 25 July 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Teva & Sandoz v Astellas[1] concerning the validity of Astellas’ patent to mirabegron for use in the treatment of overactive bladder (“OAB”). [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am by Frank Cranmer
Please note that the same application portal is used for both schemes. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
“ Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts   1) Good for the Goose: Own goal for Lidl in future lookalike cases by Julius Stobbs, Amelia Sainsbury and Nirmal Trivedy “This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
Ultimately, Mr Justice Marcus Smith determined that a FRAND licence to Apple for the Portfolio was a lump sum licence, with the total sum payable by Apple being US$56.43m plus interest. [read post]