Search for: "US v. Phillips" Results 1 - 20 of 2,677
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Phillips, the testator, who died in 1861, left money in trust to be used for speeches and lectures against slavery, and also money “for the benefit of fugitive slaves. [read post]
28 May 2024, 5:42 am by Eric Goldman
Phillips also argued that the unilateral amendment right made the contract illusory, an argument that succeeded in the Harris v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Phillips of the bar of the district of Columbia, of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, London, UK (Tanisha Singh of counsel), Peer Defense Project, New York (Sarah Medina Camiscoli of counsel), and Public Counsel, Los Angeles, CA (Mark D. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Phillips of the bar of the district of Columbia, of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, London, UK (Tanisha Singh of counsel), Peer Defense Project, New York (Sarah Medina Camiscoli of counsel), and Public Counsel, Los Angeles, CA (Mark D. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 1:06 am by centerforartlaw
Phillip Barcio, Why Was Richard Serra’s Tilted Arc So Controversial? [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am by centerforartlaw
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Whether you’re here in person or participating virtually from around the country, or even overseas, I thank you for joining us. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 8:50 am by Nedim Malovic
This decision followed the Second Circuit’s earlier decision in Hamilton International Ltd v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm by renholding
[5] Commission Guidance Regarding Disclosure Related to Climate Change, Release No. 33-9106 (Feb. 2, 2010) [75 FR 6290 (Feb. 8, 2010)] [6] See Basic Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
The first and most obvious problem with the Bill is that it does nothing to address the most common scenarios and concerns in SLAPP cases. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 4:37 am by Peter Mahler
” A 1942 Court of Appeals ruling in Everett v Phillips, in which the court “refused to accept the argument that a transaction between corporations having common directors was voidable without regard to fairness,” nonetheless stopped short of overruling Munson “which continued to be cited favorably by the New York courts. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 12:15 pm by NARF
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2024.html Phillips v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
”[24]  The court continued by observing that: [H]ere, the Provision is used by an agency of the federal government to shield itself from public view. [read post]