Search for: "US v. Reed"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,001
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2024, 3:36 am
Off-White also claimed that batches of this sizes were commonly resold on platforms like Marktplaats, Instagram, and Facebook.With reference to judgments by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Arsenal v Reed (C-206/01) EU:C:2002:651 and C-324/09 L'Oréal v eBay EU:C:2011:474, the District Court of The Hague held that “use in the course of trade” is when the use takes place in the context of a commercial activity in… [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 1:56 am
As mentioned above, on Thursday 20 June 2024 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed, Sales, Hamblen, Burrows and Richards) handed down a unanimous judgment in the case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Styen J handed down judgement in the case of Prospect v Evans [2024] EWHC 1533 (KB). [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:10 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of McKnight v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 9:54 am
In part so as not to repudiate big chunks of Tam/Brunetti, the Court instead delivers a major rebuke to Reed v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 7:20 pm
Dep’t of Commerce, and Loper Bright Enters. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm
On Thursday 13 June 2024, there were hearings in Nicholas James Gwilliam v (1) Stephen Thomas Freeman (2) John William Freeman QB-2021-000981 and Tyndal v Obisulu KB-2024-001333. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:32 am
” NY Times “The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to limit access to a widely used abortion medication, rejecting a challenge from antiabortion doctors two years after the court’s conservative majority overturned Roe v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:10 am
The New Jersey Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Savage v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 7:30 am
In a 1983 case called Amusement & Music Operators Ass’n v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 5:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
8 May 2024, 12:20 pm
Reed, — N.E.3d —- (2024). [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:09 am
Javier v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:09 am
Javier v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:30 am
” The Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 5:38 am
From Judge Reed O'Connor's decision today in Sabal v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 7:28 pm
Dobbs’ reversal of Roe v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:51 pm
However, a September 2019 New York State intermediate appellate court decision – Vega v. [read post]
