Search for: "US v. Reed" Results 1 - 20 of 1,993
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  The Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
However, a September 2019 New York State intermediate appellate court decision – Vega v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:05 am by Josh Richman
Clearview AI, a 2020 lawsuit alleging violation of Illinois residents’ privacy rights under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act  EFF’s amicus brief in ACLU v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 8:50 am by Nedim Malovic
These companies’ pioneering success has recently led to a proliferation of companies that offer similar customization and personalization services, also for watches from more mid-market brands.The customization process, whereby a third party works on the watch and markets and sells the resulting modified watch, including by removing and/or re-applying the original trade mark and adding features not on the original model, raises several IP questions, including questions about trade mark… [read post]