Search for: "US v. Samuel Gaines"
Results 1 - 20
of 292
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2024, 9:56 pm
McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm
Circuit’s decision in Blassingame v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Whatever one’s view about the constitutional status of reproductive rights for women, reading what Justice Samuel Alito’s majority opinion in Dobbs said about Roe v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm
The behavioral economics field gives us principles that suggest the loss of social security benefits will yield strong emotional and/or litigious responses, with the potential for carry-over into the private pension sphere.[7] To summarize why this is likely to occur: (1) individuals—using the status quo as their reference point—tend to view change as either a gain or a loss from the status quo; (2) “[s]ince losses loom larger [people… [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For example, in Liu v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:35 pm
Today I attended oral arguments at the US Supreme Court for Trump v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Whether you’re here in person or participating virtually from around the country, or even overseas, I thank you for joining us. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am
Whilst the design of the proposed extension has changed since then (in a way which, ironically, attracts criticism from other objectors), the LPA informs me that its “core concerns” remain such that the proposals are “unlikely to gain planning permission” (9 November 2023) [7]. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 12:47 pm
Supreme Court, however, held in AMG Capital Management LLC v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
During last week’s Supreme Court oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:46 am
For Trump v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Texas, Collens v. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm
The Constitution uses the words "Duties, Imposts, and Excises – all of which are subject to the rule of uniformity, not apportionment—as being in the words of the Hylton v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 10:21 pm
It is true that Alexander Hamilton and one Supreme Court Justice, Samuel Chase in Hylton v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 2:40 pm
This rule also introduces standardized reporting metrics to be used by private funds. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am
They’re participating, they’re parenting but they’re not using the regulatory construction that we all understand. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 10:44 am
’” In a solo dissent, Thomas criticized what he characterized as the majority’s “surprising and misplaced reliance on New York Times v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 8:14 am
—Samuel Butler 1First Acceptance Ins. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
" Contemporary debates about originalism sometimes use the label, "the New Originalism" to distinguish the current emphasis on "original public meaning" from older forms of originalism that emphasized "original intentions. [read post]
