Search for: "US v. Sierra" Results 1 - 20 of 897
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2024, 8:32 am by Gene Takagi
” NY Times “The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to limit access to a widely used abortion medication, rejecting a challenge from antiabortion doctors two years after the court’s conservative majority overturned Roe v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioners have not demonstrated their status as condemnees for purposes of challenging the IDA's condemnation of the subject roads, which are owned by the Town and were previously discontinued pursuant to Highway Law § 207 (compare Matter of Sierra Club v Village of Painted Post, 26 NY3d 301, 310 [2015]; Matter of Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v Common Council of City of Albany, 13 NY3d 297, 305 [2009]). [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioners have not demonstrated their status as condemnees for purposes of challenging the IDA's condemnation of the subject roads, which are owned by the Town and were previously discontinued pursuant to Highway Law § 207 (compare Matter of Sierra Club v Village of Painted Post, 26 NY3d 301, 310 [2015]; Matter of Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v Common Council of City of Albany, 13 NY3d 297, 305 [2009]). [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:33 am by Dan Farber
See Loretto  (temporary physical invasions should be assessed by case-specific factual inquiry); Tahoe–Sierra  (duration of regulatory restriction is a factor for court to consider); National Bd. of YMCA v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
Each identified victim will receive between US$30,000 and US$65,000, with larger sums going to children, women and older persons due to their particular vulnerabilities. [read post]