Search for: "USA v. Handy"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2023, 6:11 am
See Handy & Harman v. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm
In Largo Legacy Group, LLC v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:57 am
The last time I read something that made me feel quite this flavor of incandescent was a decade ago, in law school — it was Scalia’s dissent in Lawrence v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 10:06 am
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 7:39 am
Portugal v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 12:39 pm
NSA and Smith v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 2:23 pm
The ruling in ACLU v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 1:35 am
Home Depot USA, Inc., (9th Cir.). [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 9:16 am
Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 7:39 am
If you’ve got a piece of personal data that you’d like forgotten, all you have to do is fill out Google’s handy online form. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 10:36 am
To help make sense of it all, here's a handy infographic illustrating EFF's current Freedom of Information Act caseload. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:53 am
As reported previously on this weblog, in 2012 the World Trade Organization (WTO) Appellate Body decided in favour of Mexico in the long-standing Mexico v USA dolphin-safe labelling dispute. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 5:00 am
Postnups may also come in handy for trust fund babies. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 6:18 am
Your Curmudgeon is currently in Quincy, Illinois, working with co-counsel to prepare for the upcoming trial, which starts next week, in the case of The Diocese of Quincy, et al. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:11 am
Britax Childcare Pty Ltd v Infa-Secure Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 467. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 3:20 am
American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 10:22 am
In Donovan v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:21 am
USA (Orange Book Blog) Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 7:46 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
