Search for: "USA v. Lord"
Results 1 - 20
of 190
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
For instance in Tremblay et al. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 10:43 pm
This volume explores the legal aspects of hashtags as trade marks in the EU, Germany, and the USA, and considered whether the law currently maintains the balance between freedom of expression and protection of competition. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am
Sky News, Evan Law, USA Today, BBC, the Washington Post and Guardian are some of the many outlets to cover the new legislation and its implications. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 8:08 am
Lord Leggatt, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lady Rose made the majority decision. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 4:59 am
Carly Forrest et al, Lexology: Vicarious Liability in Scotland – the retreat continues: on the recent Inner House judgment in C & S v Shaw and Live Active Leisure [2023] CSIH 36. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:47 pm
Lundbeck A/S v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 4:36 pm
” Davidoff & Ors v (i) Dhir Doshi and (ii) Thomas Govan [Claim No. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm
, originality, what is idea and what is expression, what are the elements of and standards for substantial similarity and in the USA, fair use. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm
” A Lord Chamberlain for the internet? [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
” A Lord Chamberlain for the internet? [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 4:40 am
[i] The case was subsequently appealed before the Supreme Court of the USA. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 12:29 am
Some conclusions are drawn in Part V. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 1:44 am
In the case of the USA, which is governed by Part 2, section 83A contains the detailed forum protection provisions. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm
It’s a system which has generally worked well over the years and is a world away from, say, the absurdity of politically appointed judges in the USA. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm
Lord Leggatt in Lloyd emphasized the spirit of flexibility of representative actions. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am
The US Government has succeeded in its appeal against the decision not to extradite WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange (USA v Julian Assange [2021] EWHC 3313 (Admin)). [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:40 pm
” This refers to the judgment of the House of Lords in the Naomi Campbell case. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:04 am
She wanted to recover the cost of a commercial surrogacy arrangement in the USA and to use donor eggs. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 10:16 am
” This refers to the judgment of the House of Lords in the Naomi Campbell case. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm
On 28 and 29 April 2021, the Supreme Court (Lord Reed, Lady Arden, Lords Sales, Leggatt and Burrows) heard the Google appeal against the Court of Appeal’s 2 October 2019 decision ([2019] EWCA Civ 1599). [read post]
