Search for: "USA v. Michel"
Results 1 - 20
of 147
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
Wade, Griswold v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 10:43 pm
This volume explores the legal aspects of hashtags as trade marks in the EU, Germany, and the USA, and considered whether the law currently maintains the balance between freedom of expression and protection of competition. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am
On the same day, judgment was handed down by Tipples J in Piepenbrock v Michell & Ors [2024] EWHC 544 (KB). [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
USA, Inc. , 7 F.4th 1320 (Fed. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:22 am
Appellate Court Compensation Case Earley (Michele) v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am
In the build up to the preliminary hearing, the defendants applied to the District Court for the Southern District of New York (the DCSDNY) on 6 December 2022 for an order requiring HSBC Bank USA NA (HSBC USA) to produce two very broad categories of banking documents relating to Mr Soriano’s companies in reliance on 28 USC §1782 (the 1782 application). [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 6:40 pm
” John Fritze of USA Today reports that “Supreme Court grapples with challenge to Biden immigration policy on deportation. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm
Secretary of state for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Michelle Donelan welcomed President Biden’s executive order implementing the EU-US Data Privacy Framework. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:05 am
Habib, who is Australian, had been one of the four petitioners in Rasul v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 11:06 am
Parker v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
"An employee is constructively discharged when her or his employer, rather than discharging the plaintiff directly, deliberately created working conditions so intolerable that a reasonable person in the plaintiff's position would have felt compelled to resign" (Golston-Green v City of New York, 184 AD3d at 44; see Nelson v HSBC Bank USA, 41 AD3d 445, 447). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
"An employee is constructively discharged when her or his employer, rather than discharging the plaintiff directly, deliberately created working conditions so intolerable that a reasonable person in the plaintiff's position would have felt compelled to resign" (Golston-Green v City of New York, 184 AD3d at 44; see Nelson v HSBC Bank USA, 41 AD3d 445, 447). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
"An employee is constructively discharged when her or his employer, rather than discharging the plaintiff directly, deliberately created working conditions so intolerable that a reasonable person in the plaintiff's position would have felt compelled to resign" (Golston-Green v City of New York, 184 AD3d at 44; see Nelson v HSBC Bank USA, 41 AD3d 445, 447). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
"An employee is constructively discharged when her or his employer, rather than discharging the plaintiff directly, deliberately created working conditions so intolerable that a reasonable person in the plaintiff's position would have felt compelled to resign" (Golston-Green v City of New York, 184 AD3d at 44; see Nelson v HSBC Bank USA, 41 AD3d 445, 447). [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm
The work has been comprehensively updated to take in the latest case including Lachaux, Stocker, Serafin, Lloyd v Google, Economou, Wright v Ver, Wright v Granath, Corbyn v Millett, Duchess of Sussex v Associated, and Soriano v Forensic News. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 5:46 pm
Supreme Court has posted online the transcript and audio of today’s oral argument in Biden v. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 2:49 pm
Judge Michel brief. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 5:01 am
The fact checkers could retire on Michelle Obama's rant alone. [read post]
27 May 2021, 8:27 am
Nearly forty years ago, Judge Michels said for this court in Ford v. [read post]
