Search for: "Under Seal 1 v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 832
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 7:24 am
Or it may entail keeping the details of the warrant under seal, while announcing its existence (e.g. here). [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
Moreover, the draft instrument properly circumvents the peculiar lack of an exemption from legalisation in the HCCH 2019 Convention by recognizing the seal of the court as sufficient authentication for the purposes of recognition and enforcement.[36] It remains to be seen if decisions of third states “domesticated” in [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
A few months after the Oregon hearings, Judge Weinstein, in the fall of 1996, along with other federal and state judges, held a “Daubert” hearing on the admissibility of expert witness opinion testimony in breast implant cases, pending in New York state and federal courts. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:23 am
In P.D. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
The United States, like many other functioning democracies, is hardly immune from backsliding and lurching toward autocracy. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:47 pm
When public records are kept under seal, the public is deprived of access to information that may help investigators or prosecutors to close an investigative loop. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 11:35 am
United States (8th Cir. 2024). [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 11:20 am
Hasemann v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 8:50 am
Though different in their details, these cases elucidate this issue from different perspectives:In January 2024, Rolex was successful in a US trade mark infringement case against BeckerTime before the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:52 am
FTC, 710 F.2d 1165, 1178 (6th Cir.1983) (so stating in opposition to sealing generally). [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:44 am
We’d all been working for over a year on a contract that would make it possible, someday in the future, for everyone to have free and open access to all the official court decisions ever published in the United States. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm
Constitutional Rights Constitutional rights refer to the rights bestowed upon everyone by the United States and Minnesota constitutions. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:55 am
” United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Source/origin and control over quality is the core of TM and has special relevance when trying to figure out what rights the plaintiff is claiming to own; sponsorship/affiliation is of lesser importance, albeit still relevant; sponsorship/affiliation might be better handled under 43, which could have stronger guardrails; consider Lexmark as a case about 43(a), which the Court says it is, and not about 43(a)(1)(B) only. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 2:38 am
The affidavit does not constitute documentary evidence under CPLR 3211(a)(1) (Mamoon v Dot Net Inc., 135 AD3d 656, 657 [1st Dept 2016]), nor does the affidavit utterly refute the claims. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
It had to be spelled out by law under the Oath or Affirmation Clause of Article VI. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
During Tuesday’s oral argument before the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm
State-registered advisers need to examine their states’ regulations to determine who constitutes a “client. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 5:55 am
Those who coined the term “backdoor search” point to a 2019 decision (pp. 68-79), United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:16 am
United States, 289 U.S. 1 (1933). [read post]
