Search for: "United States v. Cross"
Results 1 - 20
of 7,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2024, 3:35 am
It is our solemn duty to diligently guard these rights regardless of the crime charged, the reputation of the accused, or the pressure to convict (see Boyd v United States, 116 US 616, 635 [1886] [“It is the duty of courts to be watchful for the constitutional rights of the citizen, and against any stealthy encroachments thereon”]). [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 1:46 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
The United States, like many other functioning democracies, is hardly immune from backsliding and lurching toward autocracy. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 8:38 am
United States and asked whether I would post on the decision here. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had little justification in the internationallaw the United States claimed to be upholding, and the United States prosecuted the wars whileindifferent to the civilian casualties they imposed. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 3:57 am
We now have a major decision out of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit that could prove an important precedent in resisting the growing anti-free speech movement in the United States. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:00 am
In 1962, in Robinson v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:27 am
The court granted the SEC’s summary judgment motion in part, holding that the defendants had offered and sold unregistered securities since it found that TerraUSD, LUNA and MIR tokens were investment contracts under United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
On June 24, 2022, the United States Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:20 am
It targets non-U.S. persons who are outside the United States and authorizes the government to compel certain communication service providers within the United States to assist the government in acquiring those targets’ communications. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:06 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
The case – SEC v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:19 am
The short summary I prepared fleshes out the themes I hope to cover: Regulatory governance is well within a process of transformation from a managerial system deeply embedded in the classical model of the rule-of-law state grounded in positive (or customary) law pronounced by an authoritative body clothed in the legislative power, to the world of the panopticon and the disciplines. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Indeed, as one federal court recently stated, “the ‘crypto’ nomenclature may be of recent vintage, but the challenged transactions fall comfortably within the framework that courts have used to identify securities for nearly eighty years. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 1:15 pm
§ 1983) United States, et al. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 2:30 pm
State Auto. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 10:51 pm
Moving on to the Court’s next opinion, in State v. [read post]
