Search for: "United States v. Di Re" Results 1 - 20 of 869
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Sarah Friedman
On May 17, 1954, the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision in Brown v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:47 pm by Mark Ashton
The case has a custody aspect as well since Kemble sought to be re-united with her teenage daughters who were then the “property” of their father. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
The initial tests of the newly articulated standard for admissibility of opinion testimony in silicone litigation did not go well.[3]  Peer review, which was absent in the re-analyses relied upon in the Bendectin litigation, was superficially present in the studies relied upon in the silicone litigation. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
At every level of government in the United States (and often in other countries), there are laws that empower the public to file requests for public records. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Reversing theDistrict Court’s operative holding, the majority concludedthat for purposes of Section 3, the Presidency is an officeunder the United States and the President is an officer ofthe United States. [read post]
So every time a relative sues to try to get damages for the death of a relative in the United States, those are all statutory. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Lurton died in 1914, Lamar died in 1916, and Hughes resigned in 1916 to run for president. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Holmes had greatly admired the historian Warren’s three volume The Supreme Court in United States History; he called the book, which won the Pulitzer Prize in 1923, a “pièce de résistance. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am by Scott Bomboy
“Maybe put most boldly, I think that the question that you have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to be president of the United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 10:42 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Now that people have died, we'll see litigation surrounding this. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
But one claim can proceed—the one asserting that China hoarded personal-protective equipment (e.g., masks) and then sold lower-quality stuff to the United States. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:36 pm by Steven Calabresi
Beyond that, the man should be allowed to fade into history and the United States should move on. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved  Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]