Search for: "United States v. Strong"
Results 1 - 20
of 7,718
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2024, 2:08 pm
Here, the New York State Department of Financial Services (DFS) and its then-Superintendent Maria Vullo made clear their intent to harm the advocacy efforts of the National Rifle Association (NRA) by strong-arming consent decrees from insurance broker Lockton Cos. [read post]
29 May 2024, 11:19 am
In Purcell v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am
Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has won a bid to bring an appeal against his extradition to the United States. [read post]
28 May 2024, 5:59 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:00 am
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
26 May 2024, 5:23 am
International Court of Justice: South Africa v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:51 pm
United States, litigants have also asked the Court to find presidential removal powers and immunities that lack an explicit basis in the Constitution’s text. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am
Gender-affirming care Three of the cases involve constitutional challenges brought against state prohibitions on providing gender-affirming care to minors: United States v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:17 am
There are strong grounds for immediate action now to shield their faces. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:27 am
Adding to this constriction of avenues for environmental regulation is the rights of corporations to engage in political speech, following the 2010 decision Citizens United v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm
On April 23, 2024, the U.S. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am
United States, litigants have also asked the Court to find presidential removal powers and immunities that lack an explicit basis in the Constitution’s text. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am
Warrants would also provide the focal point for political and legal mobilization in third states, including the United States, making it harder to sustain military aid to Israel. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
First, the UK Government has been exemplary in ensuring the “seamless continuity” of the HCCH 2005 Choice of Court Convention throughout the uncertainties of the whole withdrawal process, as evidenced by the UK’s declarations and Note Verbale to the depositary Kingdom of the Netherlands.[17] The same applies mutatis mutandis to the HCCH 1965 Service Convention, to which all EU Member States are parties, and the HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention, which has only been ratified so… [read post]
17 May 2024, 3:00 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:57 am
Earlier this year, the Fourth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
In Sohm v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 4:17 pm
The standards for libel differ whether you are in Canada or the United States, so should one or the other decide to sue for libel, it would make a difference where they filed the lawsuit. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:02 am
Copan Italia S.p.A. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:19 pm
State deficiencies in climate litigations and actions of judges Laurent Fonbaustier / Renaud Braillet 165 Part IV: Cities, States and Climate Change: Between Competition, Conflict and Cooperation Global climate governance turning translocal Delphine Misonne 181 America’s Climate Change Policy: Federalism in Action Daniel Esty 193 Local policies on climate change in a centralized State: The Example of France Camille… [read post]
